According to an article in Forbes online, the Federal Trade Commission gave a stamp of approval to a background check company that screens job applicants based on their Internet photos and postings. The FTC determined that Social Intelligence Corp. was in compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
This means a search of what you’ve said or posted to Facebook/Twitter/Flickr/blogs and the Internet in general may become a standard part of background checks when you apply for a job.
Surely you know that employers have been Googling you for a few years. In the event you think this is “no big deal,” please review some of your postings. Haven’t we all looked back at something we posted and thought, “oops.”
The Forbes article indicates that if something job-threatening pops up on Facebook or Flickr or Craigslist in a search of you, Social Intelligence puts it into your file — and it stays there for seven years.
Purportedly, while the negative findings are kept on file, they are not reused when a new employer runs a check on you. The databse people who provide information to employers states: “Per our policies and obligations under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, we run new reports on applicants on each new search to ensure the most accurate and up-to-date information is utilized, and we store the information to maintain a verifiable chain-of-custody in-case the information is ever needed for legal reasons.”
They say that are NOT building a “database” on individuals to be evaluated each time one applies for a job.
Lest that sound comforting, think again. Anything you post on the Internet survives somewhere forever in some form: Logs, screenshots, in an Open Directory, via Alexa.com (a Google company), and even via “Wayback Machine.” A Web project I started 16 years ago on GeoCities still has reference to its initial pages; fortunately that is not a problem . . . actually it’s quite flattering as The Maritime Heritage Project, remains a valuable reference site for those seeking family world migrations. The point is if it were damaging in some way, it would still exist.
Some of the reports Social Intelligence sent to the Forbes reporter included:
- A job applicant who had a photo on a social networking site that featured multiple guns and a sword;
- Another was designated racist for joining the Facebook group, “I shouldn’t have to press 1 for English. We are in the United States. Learn the language.”
Social Intelligence’s “negative” findings will stay in the files of Workplace-Shooting-Waiting-To-Happen and No-Hablo-Espanol for seven years per the requirements of FCRA as long as those records haven’t been disputed,” says Social Intelligence COO Geoffrey Andrews. “If a record is disputed and changed then we delete the disputed record and store the new record when appropriate.”
Again, lest this sound comforting, think again. If an employer wants to dig, it’s quite easy to unearth pages of information by mining data from, “social networking websites (i.e., Facebook and others), professional networking websites (i.e., LinkedIn), blogs, wikis, video and picture sharing websites, etc.).” Some companies now require that job applicants acknowledge and approve the use of a social media background screen, just as they would a criminal and credit background check.
NOTE: If I were hiring, I would search the Internet. That information is public; Nothing posted on a system named “The World Wide Web” is confidential, so I would not ask for permission to dig.
ALWAYS be wary of posting insulting content on the Internet, whether you deem in job-threatening or not. It’s next to impossible to erase something once it gets out there. Now, with a company that specializes in capturing this and putting it into a file, it may be even harder to undo the damage wrought by an unwise tweet or posting. Handle your share/tweet/post buttons with care, and perhaps think about tools to protect you from sharing potentially humiliating and unemployment-guaranteeing material.
As for learning another language the world is getting smaller by the minute. In most nations you would know your native language and English. If you were conducting business in almost any European, Middle Eastern or Eastern nation, you probably would speak 2-3-4 languages. During a visit to Holland, I met business people who spoke Dutch, German, French, Spanish, English — all fluently. I was jealous!
Read More